AP32259


 * Personality Assessments**

The personality assessment tests were very interesting to me, and frankly one of the most exciting Wiki assignments to date. For my results, they seemed very accurate to me. The questions surrounding my ideals and what I believe in felt very tailored to my personality. As a person who is very strong in their beliefs, it was refreshing to be able to relate to some of the questions so profoundly. Among other things that I found interesting, my two highest personality types on the MMDI, were ISFP and EFSP. The system could literally not decide if I was an introvert or an extrovert. The Big Five was no help either, I was “about average” is the extroversion category. When I really sat and thought about this though, it felt accurate. I am a very open person when I first meet people, but find that if I do not relate to someone on an intellectual and emotional level, I become a voluntary introvert. I felt as though neither assessment was more accurate than the other, but that being said, both tests gave me very similar results. The Big Five felt better-rounded and seemed to cover more of the bases of my personality. As far as personal preference goes, though, I preferred the Big Five because the questions did not feel either black or white, they had more substance to them. Overall, the assessments felt true to my personality. Other than that, maybe I would look into taking a test that can finally decipher if I am and introvert or extrovert after all. Or, perhaps, that is a mystery that cannot be solved.

References: Myers, Steve. "MMDI." // Team Technology //. Google, n.d. Web. <[]>. "Five Factor Personality Test." // Personality Test //. Dr. Tom Bucannon, n.d. Web. <[]>.

Only graders edit below this line!

Grader #1: 1406307127 Grader #2: 1406319477] Grader #3: sb14-2627 Grader #4: 1406388319 Grader #5: 1406741986 =Grading Form= media type="custom" key="25032734"